Previous studies have found that cl children with cleft lip and palate
(CLP) and isolated cleft palate (CP) have elevated risk for a variety
of psychosocial problems, but the origins of such problems are unclea
r. We expected that early medical and other stressors during infancy-i
ncluding feeding problems and facial disfigurement-would have adverse
Effects on the infant, his or her caregivers, and the family environme
nt, leading to a higher than expected rate of insecure attachments amo
ng infants with clefts. Twelve-month attachment classifications of CLP
, CP, and comparison group infants were examined. No significant group
differences in attachment status were found. When 3-month infant, mat
ernal, and social/family characteristics were examined as potential pr
edictors of insecure attachment, predictors interacted with diagnostic
status. For the cleft group, infant and maternal characteristics, but
not family characteristics, significantly predicted insecure attachme
nt. For the comparison group, maternal and family characteristics, but
not factors associated with the infant, were predictive. Infants with
clefts, despite their special needs and caregiving requirements, seem
not to have elevated risk for insecure attachments at the end of thei
r first year. Contrary to social-psychological formulations, the facia
l appearance of infants with CLP had no adverse effect on the quality
of their maternal attachment.