M. Desmurget et al., CONSTRAINED AND UNCONSTRAINED MOVEMENTS INVOLVE DIFFERENT CONTROL STRATEGIES, Journal of neurophysiology, 77(3), 1997, pp. 1644-1650
This experiment was carried out to test whether or not the rules gover
ning the execution of compliant and unconstrained movements are differ
ent (a compliant motion is defined as a motion constrained by external
contact). To answer this question we examined the characteristics of
visually directed movements performed with either the index fingertip
(unconstrained) or a hand-held cursor (compliant). For each of these c
ategories of movements, two experimental conditions were investigated:
no instruction about hand path. and instruction to move the fingertip
along a straight-line path. The results of the experiment were as fol
lows. 1) The spatiotemporal characteristics of the compliant and uncon
strained movements were fundamentally different when the subjects were
not required to follow a specific hand path. 2) The instruction to pe
rform straight movements modified the characteristics of the unconstra
ined movements, but not those of the compliant movements. 3) The targe
t eccentricity influenced selectively the curvature of the ''unconstra
ined-no path instruction'' movements. Taken together, these results su
ggest that compliant and unconstrained movements involve different con
trol strategies. Our data support the hypothesis that unconstrained mo
tions are, unlike compliant motions. not programmed to follow a straig
ht-line path in the task space. These observations provide a theoretic
al reference frame within which some apparently contradictory results
reported in the movement generation literature may be explained.