P. Tang et al., DIFFERENT DISTRIBUTION OF FLUORINATED ANESTHETICS AND NONANESTHETICS IN MODEL MEMBRANE - A F-19 NMR-STUDY, Biophysical journal, 72(4), 1997, pp. 1676-1682
Despite their structural resemblance, a pair of cyclic halogenated com
pounds, 1-chloro-1,2,2-trifluorocyclobutane (F3) and 1,2-dichlorohexaf
luorocyclobutane (F6), exhibit completely different anesthetic propert
ies. Whereas the former is a potent general anesthetic, the latter pro
duces no anesthesia. Two linear compounds, isoflurane and 2,3-dichloro
octofluorobutane (F8), although not a structural pair, also show the s
ame anesthetic discrepancy. Using F-19 nuclear magnetic spectroscopy,
we investigated the time-averaged submolecular distribution of these c
ompounds in a vesicle suspension of phosphatidylcholine lipids. A two-
site exchange model was used to interpret the observed changes in reso
nance frequencies as a function of the solubilization of these compoun
ds in membrane and in water, At clinically relevant concentrations, th
e anesthetics F3 and isoflurane distributed preferentially to regions
of the membrane that permit easy contact with water. The frequency cha
nges of these two anesthetics can be well characterized by the two-sit
e exchange model. In contrast, the nonanesthetics F6 and F8 solubilize
d deeply into the lipid core, and their frequency change significantly
deviated from the prediction of the model. It is concluded that altho
ugh anesthetics and nonanesthetics may show similar hydrophobicity in
bulk solvents such as olive oil, their distributions in various region
s in biomembranes, and hence their effective concentrations at differe
nt submolecular sites, may differ significantly.