MEASURING FATIGUE AND OTHER ANEMIA-RELATED SYMPTOMS WITH THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY (FACT) MEASUREMENT SYSTEM

Citation
Sb. Yellen et al., MEASURING FATIGUE AND OTHER ANEMIA-RELATED SYMPTOMS WITH THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY (FACT) MEASUREMENT SYSTEM, Journal of pain and symptom management, 13(2), 1997, pp. 63-74
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology
ISSN journal
08853924
Volume
13
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
63 - 74
Database
ISI
SICI code
0885-3924(1997)13:2<63:MFAOAS>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
This paper reports the development and validation of a questionnaire a ssessing fatigue and anemia-related concerns in people with cancer Usi ng the 28-item. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT- G) questionnaire as a base, 20 additional questions related to the sym ptoms and concerns of patients with anemia Were developed. Thirteen of these 20 questions dealt with fatigue, while the remaining 7 covered other concerns related to anemia. Using semi-structured interviews wit h 14 anemic oncology patients and 5 oncology experts, two instruments were produced: The FACT-Fatigue (FACT-F), consisting of the FACT-G plu s 13 fatigue items, and the FACT-Anemia (FACT-An), consisting of the F ACT-F plus 7 nonfatigue items. These measures were, in turn, tested on a second sample of 50 cancer patients with hemoglobin levels ranging from 7 to 15.9 g/dL. The 41-item FACT-F and the 48 item FACT-An scores were found to be stable (test-retest r = 0.87 for both) and internall y consistent (coefficient alpha range = 0.95-0.96). The symptom-specif ic subscales also showed good stability (test-retest r range = 0.84-0. 90), and the Fatigue subscale showed strong internal consistency (coef ficient alpha range = 0.93-095). Internal consistency of the miscellan eous nonfatigue items was lower but acceptable (alpha range = 0.59-0.7 0), particularly in light of their strong relationship to patient-rate d performance status and hemoglobin level. Convergent and discriminant validity testing revealed a significant positive relationship with ot her known measures of fatigue, a significant negative relationship wit h vigor and a predicted lack of relationship with social desirability. The total scores of both scales differentiated patients by hemoglobin fatigue level (p < 0.05) and patient-rated performance status (p < 0. 0001). The 13-item Fatigue subscale of the FACT-F and the 7 nonfatigue items of the FACT-An also differentiated patients by hemoglobin level (p < 0.05) and patient-rated performance status (p less than or equal to 0.001). The FACT-F and FACT-An are useful measures of quality of l ife in cancer treatment, adding more focus to the problems of fatigue and anemia. The Fatigue Subscale may also stand alone as a very brief; but reliable and valid measure of fatigue. (C) U.S. Cancer Pain Relie f Committee, 1997.