DOSE-INTENSE THERAPY WITH ETOPOSIDE, IFOSFAMIDE, CISPLATIN, AND EPIRUBICIN (VIP-E) IN 100 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH, LIMITED-DISEASE AND EXTENSIVE-DISEASE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER
S. Fetscher et al., DOSE-INTENSE THERAPY WITH ETOPOSIDE, IFOSFAMIDE, CISPLATIN, AND EPIRUBICIN (VIP-E) IN 100 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH, LIMITED-DISEASE AND EXTENSIVE-DISEASE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER, Annals of oncology, 8(1), 1997, pp. 49-56
Background. We conducted a phase I/II trial to assess the feasibility
and activity of VIP-E chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. End-poin
ts were treatment-related morbidity and mortality, response to treatme
nt, duration of response, and survival. Patients and methods. Two cycl
es of combination chemotherapy followed by granulocyte colony-stimulat
ing factor (G-CSF) were given at a dose of etoposide (500 mg/m(2)), if
osfamide (4000 mg/m(2)), cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)), and epirubicin (50 mg
/m(2)) to 100 consecutive patients with SCLC. Thirty patients (19 with
LD, and 11 with ED SCLC) proceeded to VIC-E high-dose chemotherapy wi
th autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) at a
cumulative dose of etoposide 1500 mg/ m(2), ifosfamide 12,000 mg/m(2),
carboplatin 750 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 150 mg/m(2) (VIC-E). Surgical
resection of primary tumor was attempted at the earliest feasible poin
t. Thoracic irradiation was given after completion of chemotherapy. Re
sults of conventional-dose VIP-E: 97 patients were evaluable for respo
nse. Objective response rate was 81% in LD-SCLC (33% CR, 48% PR; exclu
ding patients in surgical CR) and 77% in ED-SCLC (18% CR, 58% PR). Tre
atment mortality was 2%. Median survival was 19 months in LD-SCLC and
6 months in ED-SCLC. Two-year survival was 36% in LD and 0% in ED SCLC
. Results of high-dose VIC-E: All 30 patients improved on or maintaine
d prior responses. Four patients (13%) died of treatment-related compl
ications. Median survival was 26 months in LD-SCLC and 8 months in ED-
SCLC. Two-year survival was 53% in LD and 9% in ED SCLC. Conclusion: V
IP-E chemotherapy is an effective induction therapy for SCLC. Compared
with traditional protocols such as ACO or carboplatin/etoposide, resp
onse rates are slightly improved, while survival is not different In t
he LD SCLC subgroup, high-dose chemotherapy improved response rates an
d survival, especially for patients in surgical CR prior to high-dose
therapy. In ED SCLC, however, higher response-rates did not translate
into improved survival. Selected LD-SCLC patients with good partial or
complete remissions after prior therapy may benefit from HDC and PBSC
T.