R. Kaaks et E. Riboli, THE ROLE OF MULTICENTER COHORT STUDIES IN STUDYING THE RELATION BETWEEN DIET AND CANCER, Cancer letters, 114(1-2), 1997, pp. 263-270
In spite of important progress made during recent decades in nutrition
al epidemiology methods, many questions about the role of diet in dete
rmining dancer risk remain elusive. One example of an unresolved quest
ion is whether a high percentage of energy intake in the form of fat (
especially saturated fat) is associated with an increased risk of brea
st cancer. Observations from international correlation and case-contro
l studies support this hypothesis, while results from prospective coho
rt studies, generally considered less prone to bias, do not. In this p
aper, we review the advantages and limitations of these different type
s of epidemiological study design, and discuss how multi-centre studie
s may help answer some of the unresolved questions about relations bet
ween diet, nutritional status, and cancer risk. Multi-centre cohort st
udies may have the advantage of increased statistical power because of
larger variations in individuals' dietary intake patterns and disease
risk (as in international correlation studies), while at the same tim
e offering all the possibilities of individual-level studies to model
confounding and/or interaction effects. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Irel
and Ltd.