COMPARISON OF AGAR DILUTION, BROTH MICRODILUTION, DISK DIFFUSION, E-TEST, AND BACTEC RADIOMETRIC METHODS FOR ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CLINICAL ISOLATES OF THE NOCARDIA-ASTEROIDES COMPLEX
A. Ambaye et al., COMPARISON OF AGAR DILUTION, BROTH MICRODILUTION, DISK DIFFUSION, E-TEST, AND BACTEC RADIOMETRIC METHODS FOR ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CLINICAL ISOLATES OF THE NOCARDIA-ASTEROIDES COMPLEX, Journal of clinical microbiology, 35(4), 1997, pp. 847-852
An evaluation was undertaken to determine the optimal method for the i
n vitro susceptibility testing of 26 Nocardia asteroides complex isola
tes to the following antimicrobial agents: amikacin, ampicillin, amoxi
cillin-clavulanate, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, imipenem
, minocycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, Five testing methods
were studied including the agar dilution, broth microdilution, and di
sk diffusion methods, the epsilometer test (E-test), and the BACTEC ra
diometric method. Results for each antimicrobial agent and each testin
g method were interpreted as indicating susceptibility, intermediate s
usceptibility, or resistance according to current guidelines of the Na
tional Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) for bacteri
a that grow aerobically and were then compared to a ''gold standard''
susceptibility test result, The gold standard result for each Nocardia
isolate was established by a consensus of the results of the majority
of testing methods used in the study, When the results were combined
for all antimicrobial agents tested against all Nocardia isolates by a
ll methods, the BACTEC radiometric method produced the highest level o
f agreement (97.9%) with the consensus results and had the fewest very
major (n = 1), major (n = 2), and minor (n = 2) errors. In contrast,
the results of the agar dilution method were in least agreement (93.2%
) with the consensus results, and this method also produced the most v
ery major (n = 8), major (n = 4), and, along with the disk diffusion m
ethod, minor (n = 6) errors, For all test methods, interpretive errors
were most frequent when testing ampicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate
. Moreover, for all Nocardia nova isolates tested, ampicillin suscepti
bility results by any of the testing methods were not in agreement wit
h the results of testing for beta-lactamase by the nitrocefin (Cefinas
e) disk method, We conclude that among the methods evaluated, the BACT
EC radiometric method appeared to be the best for determining the in v
itro susceptibilities of members of the N. asteroides complex to a pan
el of nine antimicrobial agents, However, none of the test methods, in
cluding the BACTEC method, accurately predicted the ampicillin resista
nce of the N. nova isolates tested, all of which produced beta-lactama
se. Presuming that this beta-lactamase hydrolyzes ampicillin, this dis
parity may relate to the NCCLS breakpoints that were used, which may r
equire modification for this antimicrobial agent when tested against N
. nova isolates.