Js. Lawton et al., MYOCARDIAL PROTECTION IN THE ACUTELY INJURED HEART - HYPERPOLARIZING VERSUS DEPOLARIZING HYPOTHERMIC CARDIOPLEGIA, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 113(3), 1997, pp. 567-575
Objectives: The superiority of hyperpolarized arrest with adenosine tr
iphosphate-sensitive potassium channel openers over standard hyperkale
mic depolarizing cardioplegia during normothermic ischemia has been do
cumented, This study examined the hypothesis that pinacidil would prov
ide superior protection in a more clinically relevant model of an acut
ely injured heart and hypothermic cardioplegic arrest, Methods: In a b
lood-perfused, parabiotic, rabbit heart Langendorff model, hearts unde
rwent 15 minutes of unprotected global normothermic ischemia before th
e administration of 50 mi of cardioplegic solution at 4 degrees C, fol
lowed by 50 minutes of hypothermic (15 degrees C) ischemia and 30 minu
tes of reperfusion, The cardioplegic solutions administered consisted
of Krebs-Henseleit solution alone (N = 6), Krebs-Henseleit solution wi
th pinacidil (50 mu mol/L; N = 10), Krebs-Henseleit solution with pina
cidil (50 mu mol/L) and glibenclamide (a potassium channel blocker, 10
mu mol/L; N = 8), or St, Thomas' Hospital solution (N = 8), The perce
nt recovery of developed pressure, linear diastolic pressure-volume re
lationships, and coronary blood dow were con;pared, Results: The perce
nt recovery of developed pressure was 32.8% +/- 2.8%, 43.0% +/- 4.3%,
46.5% +/- 2.2%, and 49.3% +/- 2.7% for the Krebs-Henseleit, the Krebs-
Henseleit with pinacidil and glibenclamide, the St, Thomas' Hospital,
and the Krebs-Henseleit with pinacidil groups, respectively, No hearts
had ventricular fibrillation on reperfusion, Conclusions: During hypo
thermic hyperpolarized arrest, as opposed to normothermic ischemia as
in our previous studies, there was neither an increased incidence of v
entricular fibrillation nor prolonged electrical activity when compare
d dth results during traditional hyperkalemic arrest, Myocardial prote
ction by St. Thomas' Hospital solution and pinacidil was superior (p =
0.009) to that with Krebs-Henseleit solution alone, The protection pr
ovided by pinacidil was lost with the addition of glibenclamide, indic
ating that the drug has adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium cha
nnel activity during hypothermia.