P. Maisonblanche et al., COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF ORAL TREATMENT WITH CIBENZOLINE AND FLECAINIDE IN THE SECONDARY PREVENTION OF PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL TACHYARRHYTHMIAS, Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie, 46(2), 1997, pp. 109-116
Although paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias are the commonest form of arrhy
thmia, their therapeutic management still remains controversial. Seven
ty one patients-were included in a multicentre, randomized double-blin
d, double-placebo study, in parallel groups (37 in group C and 34 in g
roup F) to compare the efficacy of cibenzoline (C) and flecainide (F),
administered orally, in the prevention of recurrent atrial arrhythmia
. The arrhythmia usually consisted of atrial fibrillation (n = 65), wh
ile 6 patients presented with paroxysmal atrial flutter. The mean dail
y dosages were 221 +/- 60 mg (C) and 165 +/- 49 mg (F). The mean age w
as 63 +/- 12 years in group C and 63 +/- 16 years in group F. In this
trial, atrial arrhythmia was idiopathic in almost two-thirds of cases.
The duration of follow-up of this study was 6 months, during which re
currences of arrhythmia were evaluated in terms of the symptoms experi
enced and in terms of ECG and Holter examinations repeated at the 3rd
and 6th months. Supplementary ECG and Holter examinations were also pe
rformed in the presence of a clinical suspicion of recurrent symptoms.
Comparison of the percentages of patients not developing a documented
recurrence and who tolerated treatment, by Kaplan-Meier curves, showe
d a significant difference between cibenzoline (58%) and flecainide (5
6%), In the not-responders, the mean time to recurrence was 75 +/- 48
days in group C and 75 +/- 62 days in group F (NS). Six patients dropp
ed out of the trial because of adverse events, including 3 cardiac adv
erse events (2 case of ventricular proarrhythmic activity). Four extra
cardiac adverse events led to discontinuation of treatment in group C.
In conclusion, the efficacy of cibenzoline and flecainide in the seco
ndary prevention of atrial arrhythmia was found to be comparable, with
58% and 56% of patients in sinus rhythm, respectively, with a follow-
up of 6 months.