Jf. Platt et al., LUPUS NEPHRITIS - PREDICTIVE VALUE OF CONVENTIONAL AND DOPPLER US ANDCOMPARISON WITH SEROLOGIC AND BIOPSY PARAMETERS, Radiology, 203(1), 1997, pp. 82-86
PURPOSE: To compare conventional and Doppler ultrasound (US) with clin
ical and biopsy parameters used to assess disease activity and outcome
in lupus nephritis and to assess the predictive value of US. MATERIAL
S AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with lupus nephritis prospectively
underwent laboratory and US analysis at the time of renal biopsy. US
parameters were renal length, relative echogenicity, and resistive ind
ex (RI). Laboratory parameters were serum creatinine level, urinary pr
otein level, and serum markers of disease activity. Biopsy parameters
were activity index, chronicity index, and assessment of the tubuloint
erstitium of the kidney. Follow-up data were obtained in all patients
for at least 1 year. RESULTS: Ten patients with elevated RI (> 0.70) h
ad significantly (P < .05) higher chronicity indexes and creatinine le
vels than the 24 patients with a more normal RI. RI correlated signifi
cantly (P < .05) with creatinine level, chronicity index, and presence
of interstitial disease. Only RI and chronicity index were statistica
lly significant predictors of a poor renal outcome. Abnormalities at c
onventional US were not predictive of renal outcome. A normal RI predi
cted a better renal outcome whether or not creatinine level was elevat
ed. CONCLUSION: Renal Doppler US may be of greatest clinical utility w
hen its results are apparently discordant with renal functional assess
ment by allowing identification of patients with higher likelihood of
subsequent improvement or worsening of renal status.