The equilibrium per-genome mutation rate in sexual species is thought
to result from a trade-off between the benefits of reducing the delete
rious mutation rate and the costs of increasing fidelity(1,2). We prop
ose that selection will often favour a lower mutation rate on the X ch
romosome than on autosomes, owing to the exposure of deleterious reces
sive mutations on hemizygous chromosomes. We tested this hypothesis by
examining 33 X-linked genes that have been sequenced in both mouse an
d rat, and compared their rate of evolution against 238 autosomal gene
s. The X-linked genes were found to have a significantly lower rate of
synonymous substitution than the autosomal genes. Neither the suppose
d higher mutation rate in males nor stronger purifying selection again
st slightly deleterious mutations on the X chromosome can account for
the low value. The most parsimonious explanation is that rodents have
a lower mutation rate on the X chromosome than on autosomes. It is the
refore likely that previous indirect estimates of the excess male muta
tion rate are inaccurate. Indeed, after correction we find no evidence
for a male-biased mutation rate in rodents. Furthermore, the rate of
synonymous substitution in Y-linked genes is not significantly differe
nt from that in autosomal ones. The extent to which enhanced male muta
tion rates are problematic(3) for the mutational deterministic model(4
) of the evolution of sex must, in turn, be questioned.