TWO reinforced concrete bridge bents were subjected to large, transver
se displacements. The bents contained detailing deficiencies typical o
f the 1960s, including minimal transverse reinforcement, short reinfor
cing splices, and a lack of top reinforcement in the footings. Spallin
g of the concrete cover at the column tops began at a drift ratio of 1
.5%. At this drift ratio, the column displacement ductility was approx
imately four, the curvature ductility was eight, and nominal curvature
in the plastic hinges corresponded to a nominal maximum concrete stra
in of 0.01. In spite of their deficiencies, the bents resisted transve
rse loads equal to nearly 40% of the bridge's weight at a drift ratio
of 3%. The ductile response was attributed to a low shear demand and t
o the influence of the soil in redistributing the rotational demands a
way from the column splices. The measured response was reproduced well
by an analytical model that considered the nonlinear force-deformatio
n relationships of the columns and soil. The results of a parametric s
tudy indicated that the soil surrounding the column bases increased th
e column shear demand by 25%.