FEEDING AND REPRODUCTION BY CALANUS-FINMARCHICUS, AND MICROZOOPLANKTON GRAZING DURING MESOCOSM BLOOMS OF DIATOMS AND THE COCCOLITHOPHORE EMILIANIA-HUXLEYI
Jc. Nejstgaard et al., FEEDING AND REPRODUCTION BY CALANUS-FINMARCHICUS, AND MICROZOOPLANKTON GRAZING DURING MESOCOSM BLOOMS OF DIATOMS AND THE COCCOLITHOPHORE EMILIANIA-HUXLEYI, Marine ecology. Progress series, 147(1-3), 1997, pp. 197-217
The aim of this study was to quantify zooplankton feeding interactions
and copepod reproduction during blooms of diatoms and flagellates (in
cluding Emiliania huxleyi) in fertilised mesocosms. A number of microz
ooplankton grazing (dilution series), copepod feeding (bottle incubati
on) and egg production experiments were performed during a 4 wk summer
period. Microzooplankton (mainly ciliates) peaked during an initial b
loom dominated by the diatom Skeletonema costatum and flagellates grea
ter than or equal to 10 mu m, which apparently became grazer-controlle
d. Maximum grazing rates were 1.5 to 1.8 d(-1) for diatoms, the calcif
ying haptophyte Emiliania huxleyi and flagellates 2 to 10 mu m, and 65
to 80% of the average standing stock of these algae were removed dail
y. During a subsequent bloom of E. huxleyi the microzooplankton compos
ition changed and its biomass decreased to <25%, and the daily turnove
r of diatoms and E. huxleyi fell to ca 50%. In contrast to other algae
, E. huxleyi specific growth was never surpassed by microzooplankton g
razing. The copepod C. finmarchicus (CV and CVI females) preferred cil
iates greater than or equal to 30 mu m, but ciliates <30 mu m, diatoms
and rotifers were also occasionally preyed upon at high rates. E. hux
leyi was barely ingested at low concentrations (0.4 to 6 x 10(5) cells
l(-1), but was cleared at 106 ml ind.(-1) d(-1) at peak concentration
s (1.2 x 10(7) cells l(-1)). It then made up 74% of total carbon inges
tion. Although copepod ingestion rates were similar during blooms of d
iatoms and E. huxleyi, egg production rates were significantly higher
during blooms of the latter, and mesozooplankton biomass increased 3 t
imes more in mesocosms dominated by E. huxleyi compared to mesocosms w
ith diatom blooms at similar algal biomass. Impact by copepods on the
phytoplankton development was mainly induced indirectly by selective p
redation on the microzooplankton. A method to correct copepod feeding
rate measurements for errors due to loss of microzooplankton grazing i
n the incubation bottles is presented.