COMPARISON BETWEEN DOBUTAMINE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND TL-201 SCINTIGRAPHY IN DETECTING RESIDUAL STENOSIS, ISCHEMIA, AND NECROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH PRIOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
E. Macieiracoelho et al., COMPARISON BETWEEN DOBUTAMINE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND TL-201 SCINTIGRAPHY IN DETECTING RESIDUAL STENOSIS, ISCHEMIA, AND NECROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH PRIOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION, Clinical cardiology, 20(4), 1997, pp. 351-356
Background: Following the first attempts to detect myocardial ischemia
with two-dimensional echocardiography stress testing, pharmacologic s
tress using dobutamine infusion has become an alternative to echocardi
ography exercise testing for evaluation of coronary artery disease. It
has been shown that stress echocardiography has a diagnostic accuracy
similar to that of an exercise thallium test. Other studies, however,
indicated that radionuclide myocardial per-fusion imaging was more se
nsitive than exercise or pharmacologic stress echocardiography for det
ection of ischemia or jeopardized myocardium. Hypothesis. The aim of t
he present study was to determine the ability of dobutamine stress ech
ocardiography in comparison with thallium-201 scintigraphy to identify
multivessel disease and the presence of myocardial scar and ischemia
in 60 consecutive patients who suffered a first myocardial infarction
(MI). Methods: Patients were evaluated by coronary angiography and ven
triculography, thallium-201 (Tl-201) tomographic scintigraphy, and dob
utamine echocardiography within 3 months of a first MI. Forty-seven ha
d Q-wave MI and 13 had non-Q-wave MI, Eleven patients were excluded fr
om final analysis-7 because of failure to achieve target heart rate in
spite of the use of atropine, and 4 because of high blood pressure fo
llowing the infusion of dobutamine. Results: Dobutamine echocardiograp
hy showed an overall sensitivity of 43% for detection of coronary arte
ry lesions of 50-74% diameter stenosis and Tl-201 scintigraphy showed
a sensitivity of 71%. For detection of lesions of greater than or equa
l to 75% diameter stenosis, dobutamine echocardiography showed a sensi
tivity of 52% and Tl-201 a sensitivity of 70%. Overall agreement betwe
en wall motion and myocardial perfusion for detection of necrosis and/
or ischemia in the infarct area was 40.4% with a kappa coefficient of
0.09 (p = 0.13). For detection of ischemic myocardium outside the infa
rct zone, overall agreement was 78.6% with a kappa coefficient of 0.49
(p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Dobutamine echocardiography results showed
a lower sensitivity than myocardial perfusion images in predicting mul
tivessel coronary artery disease, and there was poor agreement between
both methods in identifying necrosis or ischemia.