Ss. Sandhu et al., WHO DECIDES ON THE NEED FOR ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN PATIENTS WITH MAJOR ARTHROPLASTIES REQUIRING DENTAL TREATMENT - IS IT A JOINT RESPONSIBILITY, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 79(2), 1997, pp. 143-147
The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with prosthetic joints
who require dental treatment is controversial. A Working Party of the
British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) recently suggest
ed that there was no evidence to support the use of antibiotic prophyl
axis in these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine how
closely these recommendations were being followed by maxillofacial su
rgeons (MFS), and to see if there was any consensus on the management
of these patients between MFS and orthopaedic surgeons (OPS). With the
aid of a postal questionnaire, the opinions of 250 consultant MFS and
OPS were sought, response rates were 148 (59.2%) and 113 (41.2%), res
pectively. Of the OPS, 77.7% always recommended the use of antibiotic
prophylaxis as opposed to only 29% of MFS. There were also wide differ
ences in opinion with regard to the antibiotic that should be used in
these patients, with the majority of OPS suggesting a cephalosporin, a
lthough this may not be the most efficacious antibiotic for oral strep
tococci. We conclude that this important matter seems to be far from s
atisfactorily resolved and that further cooperation between the specia
lties is required to produce guidelines for the safe and effective man
agement of this increasing group of patients.