NO TIME FOR HANDWASHING - HANDWASHING VERSUS ALCOHOLIC RUB - CAN WE AFFORD 100-PERCENT COMPLIANCE

Authors
Citation
A. Voss et Af. Widmer, NO TIME FOR HANDWASHING - HANDWASHING VERSUS ALCOHOLIC RUB - CAN WE AFFORD 100-PERCENT COMPLIANCE, Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 18(3), 1997, pp. 205-208
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Infectious Diseases
ISSN journal
0899823X
Volume
18
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
205 - 208
Database
ISI
SICI code
0899-823X(1997)18:3<205:NTFH-H>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Handwashing is the most important and least expensive measure to preve nt transmission of nosocomial infections. However, compliance rarely e xceeds 40% under study conditions. Alcoholic hand disinfection (AHD) g enerally is used in Europe. In contrast, handwashing with medicated so ap is practiced most frequently in the United States. Healthcare worke rs often explain the failure to comply with handwashing or AHD as due to the limited time available for this practice. We calculated a time consumption for handwashing and AHD in a representative model intensiv e-care unit with 12 healthcare workers, based on different compliance levels (40%, 60%, and 100%), duration of handwashing (40-80 seconds), and AHD (20 seconds). Comparing the extremes of our model, given 100% compliance, handwashing consumes 16 hours of nursing time per day shif t, whereas AHD from a bedside dispenser requires only 3 hours (P=.01). We conclude that 100% compliance with handwashing may interfere with patient care and partly explains the low compliance. In contrast, AHD, with its rapid activity, superior efficacy, and minimal time commitme nt, allows 100% healthcare-worker compliance without interfering with the quality of patient care.