Ld. Roman et al., PELVIC EXAMINATION, TUMOR-MARKER LEVEL, AND GRAY-SCALE AND DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY IN THE PREDICTION OF PELVIC CANCER, Obstetrics and gynecology, 89(4), 1997, pp. 493-500
Objective: To determine the ability of pelvic examination, tumor marke
r assessment, and transvaginal ultrasonography, with selected use of D
oppler ultrasonography, to predict pelvic malignancy. Methods: Two hun
dred twenty-six women scheduled for operative removal of a pelvic mass
were entered in the study prospectively. Each woman underwent pelvic
examination, tumor marker assessment, and transvaginal ultrasonography
preoperatively. Women whose gray-scale findings were suspicious for m
alignancy underwent Doppler ultrasonography. Suspicious findings inclu
ded masses that were fixed or irregular on pelvic examination; CA 125
level greater than 35 U/ml; elevations in serum lactic dehydrogenase,
alphafetoprotein, or hCG; and the presence of a substantial solid comp
onent on gray-scale ultrasonography. Suspicious Doppler findings inclu
ded intratumoral color flow, pulsatility index less than 1.0, or resis
tance index 0.4 or lower. The findings were correlated with the presen
ce of malignancy. Results: If all three indicators (examination, tumor
marker assessment, and gray-scale ultrasound findings) were non-suspi
cious, 99% of premenopausal women and 100% of postmenopausal women had
benign masses. If all three indicators were suspicious, 77% of premen
opausal women and 83% of postmenopausal women had malignant tumors. Lo
gistic regression identified ultrasound impression and tumor size to b
e significant predictors of malignancy in premenopausal women, whereas
CA 125 level and ultrasound impression were significant in postmenopa
usal women. In patients with suspicious gray-scale findings, recategor
ization based on Doppler findings resulted in inferior diagnostic indi
ces. Conclusions: Ultrasonographic tumor size and appearance are the b
est predictors of pelvic malignancy in premenopausal women, whereas CA
125 level and ultrasonographic appearance are the best predictors in
postmenopausal women. Neither color nor spectral Doppler is useful in
this setting. (C) 1997 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gy
necologists.