Dk. Wijesinghe et Mj. Hutchings, THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL SCALE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITY ON THE GROWTH OF A CLONAL PLANT - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY WITH GLECHOMA-HEDERACEA, Journal of Ecology, 85(1), 1997, pp. 17-28
1 Habitat heterogeneity is manifested as patches differing in quality
at a variety of spatial scales, durations or contrasts, but little is
known about its effects on the capacity of plants to forage for resour
ces and to grow. This paper investigates the effects of the spatial sc
ale of heterogeneity upon growth of the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea
. 2 Clones were grown in eight experimental environments, each contain
ing the same total amount of two types of soil distributed in separate
patches. Contrast between patch types was the same in all treatments.
The number and size of patches differed between treatments, from two
25-cm x 50-cm patches to 64 6.25-cm x 6.25-cm patches. In six of the t
reatments roots could grow freely between patches. Partitions prevente
d root growth between patches in the remaining treatments. 3 Although
all treatments provided the same quantity of nutrients, clone biomass
was dependent on the scale of heterogeneity. Biomass was highest in th
e 25-cm x 25-cm patch-size treatment and declined significantly at sma
ller patch sizes. It varied by a factor of four when only the treatmen
ts allowing root growth between patches were compared, and by a factor
of seven when the treatments preventing root growth between patches w
ere included. 4 Clones displayed a scale-dependent capacity to locate
roots selectively in nutrient-rich patches. Although the proportion of
biomass allocated by clones to above-ground structures and roots did
not differ significantly between treatments, a significantly greater p
roportion of the root biomass of clones was located in rich than in po
or patches in the larger patch-size treatments, promoting more efficie
nt foraging for nutrients in these treatments. As patch size decreased
, the proportion of clone root biomass located in the two patch types
became more equal. 5 Root:shoot ratio within clones responded to patch
scale and quality. In the larger patch-size treatments, in which clon
es foraged more efficiently, parts of clones located in rich patches h
ad a higher root:shoot ratio than parts of clones located in poor patc
hes, thus enhancing nutrient acquisition from rich patches. However, G
. herteracea behaved like plants with a single rooting point in the sm
aller patch-size treatments, in that root:shoot ratio increased when n
utrients were scarce. 6 Thus, the foraging response of G. hederacea wa
s coarse-grained in environments where patches were large. In comparis
on, G. hederacea apparently responded to environments with small-scale
patchiness as if they were homogeneously poor. It could not adjust it
s morphology rapidly enough to respond to these less predictable envir
onments where changes in patch quality were more frequent.