In the United Kingdom, water allocation is governed by an administered
licensing system, with charges unrelated to economic or environmental
costs. Such a system is unlikely to result in an economically optimal
allocation of water because it takes no account of the costs and bene
fits of each water use. However, the efficiency of the system can be i
mproved by performing a ''net-back'' analysis. This paper performs a n
et-back analysis on irrigation water demand in the East Anglia region
of the U.K. First, the simple net-back model is introduced, before exi
sting data is used to estimate farmers' willingness to pay for irrigat
ion water, both with and without the effects of agricultural and trade
subsidies. This estimate is then compared with estimates of the long-
run marginal cost of water. We find that farmers' willingness to pay (
their ''net-back'') is initially higher in general than the long-run m
arginal cost of irrigation water. However, once agricultural subsidies
are removed, the net-back becomes significantly negative for all crop
s except potatoes. In other words, agricultural subsidies are the main
factor in determining the profitability of agricultural production in
East Anglia. If the markets for agricultural products and water servi
ces were perfect, only potatoes would continue to be grown and irrigat
ed. With this in mind, we offer some conclusions concerning the curren
t mechanism for water allocation in the U.K. In particular, the licens
ing decision could be used to attempt to replicate the allocation of w
ater which would pertain if markets were perfect, as identified by our
net-back analysis, thereby increasing efficiency. (C) 1997 Academic P
ress Limited.