1. Simple models of optimal foraging, such as ideal free distribution
models, are based on the assumption that foragers are omniscient with
respect to the quality of all patches in the environment; they know ho
w much food and how many competitors are present in each patch. 2. In
contrast, simple population dynamic models treat predator-prey distrib
utions in a phenomenological way, and do not take fitness consequences
for individual foragers into account. Yet, the precise way in which t
hese distributions come into being is what really matters to populatio
n dynamics. It is therefore necessary to study the behavioural mechani
sms underlying the distributions of foragers over patches. 3. We studi
ed the behaviour of a predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis, in resp
onse to prey patches occupied by conspecifics. It is well known that h
igh predator densities in prey patches promote dispersal of these pred
atory mites. Our question was to what extent predators can assess the
presence of conspecifics from a distance. 4. Experiments with a Y-tube
olfactometer showed that predatory mites avoid patches occupied by co
nspecifics. 5. This avoidance cannot be attributed to odours of conspe
cific predators, or of prey damaged by predation, as these odour sourc
es both appear to be attractive. 6. Separating the prey patch from the
conspecific predators in the odour source led to the avoidance respon
se only when the predators in the odour source were positioned upwind
from the prey patch, and not when they were positioned downwind. This
suggests that predators release an odour that elicits the production o
f yet another odour by the prey. This was supported by the observation
that removal of adult prey led to a quick disappearance of the avoida
nce response. 7. We argue that distant discrimination between patches
with and without competing conspecifics may be quite common among pred
ators and parasitoids, and that the use of odours instead of physical
inspection of patches allows predators to instantaneously integrate in
formation on the distribution of food and competitors. 8. This behavio
ural mechanism may bring predators and parasitoids closer to behaving
as ideal free foragers than was previously thought possible.