The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between ov
ert and covert orienting of attention in visual neglect patients with
parietal and fronto-parietal lesions. Two stimuli were presented at ec
centricities of 8 degrees or 20 degrees to the left (LVF) or right (RV
F) visual fields and the patient was required to maintain fixation on
the central mark and to respond only manually upon the appearance of t
he stimulus. Neglect patients with fronto-parietal lesion showed a lac
k of oculomotor control and the presence of leftward eye movements wit
hout corresponding attentional shifts. Neglect patients with parietal
lesions did not show this phenomenon. They rarely responded ocularly a
nd manually to LVF stimuli, whereas they were unable to inhibit an aut
omatic ocular orienting reaction towards RVF stimuli. When a RVF stimu
li triggered both ocular and attentional shifts, the pattern of respon
ses revealed a retinal eccentricity effect. Patients were more accurat
e to respond to stimuli located at 8 degrees than 20 degrees. In contr
ast, when a RVF stimuli triggered only attentional shifts, the results
showed the attentional gradient effect (Ladavas, 1990). Patients were
more accurate to respond to stimuli located at 20 degrees than 8 degr
ees. Therefore,the results of the present study seem to suggest a func
tional dissociation of the mechanisms subserving attentional and gaze
orienting and a differential role played by the frontal and parietal l
obes in overt visual orienting.