QUANTIFICATION OF HEMODIALYSIS - ANALYSIS OF METHODS AND THE RELEVANCE TO PATIENT OUTCOME

Citation
Wr. Clark et al., QUANTIFICATION OF HEMODIALYSIS - ANALYSIS OF METHODS AND THE RELEVANCE TO PATIENT OUTCOME, Blood purification, 15(2), 1997, pp. 92-111
Citations number
73
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology",Hematology
Journal title
ISSN journal
02535068
Volume
15
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
92 - 111
Database
ISI
SICI code
0253-5068(1997)15:2<92:QOH-AO>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Quantification of small solute removal in patients treated with chroni c hemodialysis (HD) is widely used to assess the adequacy of both pres cribed and delivered treatment, Four recent American studies have demo nstrated a clear relationship between delivered dialysis dose and outc ome in chronic HD patients, Although a number of HD quantification met hods have been proposed, no specific technique is accepted as the gold standard at present, The primary goal of this review is to provide a critical assessment of the four recently published studies relating HD outcome to dialysis dose, As these studies involved a variety of ther apy quantification methods, a review of the most common techniques use d to measure dialysis dose is also presented, In addition, two unresol ved issues that have recently come to the forefront of HD quantificati on are presented, These issues are the role of dialysate-side measurem ent of HD dose and the potential limit of the beneficial effect of inc reasing HD dose on clinical outcome, Finally, the overall design of th e NIH HD adequacy trial is discussed, with particular attention paid t o the kinetic methods used in the study.