G. Cheeseman, CONTENDING NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND GLOBAL IMPERATIVES IN AUSTRALIA POST-COLD-WAR DEFENSE AND SECURITY THINKING, The Korean journal of defense analysis, 8(2), 1996, pp. 75
The period following the end of the Cold War has seen Australia's fore
ign policy makers place increasing emphasis on the concepts of regiona
lism and globalism as means of protecting and advancing the country's
national interests. While said to be prompted by the establishment of
a more independent and self-reliant defense posture, this trend took m
uch longer to be reflected in the country's defense policies. Australi
a's early post-Cold War defense considerations continued to be driven
by a desire to defend ourselves against threats ''coming from or throu
gh'' the region to our north, and to maintain our traditional alliance
relationship with the United States. In recent years, Australia's def
ense thinking and policies have started, on the surface at least, to f
ollow the lead set by its foreign policy and become less nationally an
d more regionally and internationally oriented. Australia's alliance r
elationship with the United States is being slowly but steadily downgr
aded in favor of greater regional engagement and cooperation, and the
Defense Department is now prepared to ''seek every opportunity'' to pa
rticipate in UN and other multinational operations. This article trace
s these develpments and how they are being interpreted. Some suggest t
hat there has been a complete convergence and that Australia's defense
policies and practices are, once again, being driven by broader, fore
ign policy concerns. Others accept some rhetorical convergence but arg
ue that Australia's evolving defense and foreign policies continue to
differ in several significant respects. In particular, Australian defe
nse planners are continuing fundamentally to prepare for the defense o
f Australia (and its interests) against the region whereas our foreign
policy makers are seeking to engage with Australia's Asian neighbors.
A third view, shared by the author, is that the Australia's emerging
post-Cold War rhetoric on defense and security is less the product of
contending views on ends and means as a new and more ambitious strateg
ic discourse aimed at securing continuing support at home while simult
aneously extending Australia's and its allies' interests abroad.