Bs. Dahlereriksen et al., C-REACTIVE PROTEIN IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - HOW COMMONLY IS IT USED AND WHY, Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 15(1), 1997, pp. 35-38
Objective - C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-known diagnostic tool i
n general practice. The scope of this study was to assess how frequent
ly CRP is used by general practitioners and to evaluate the reasons fo
r using it. Design - A retrospective part based on data from a laborat
ory database system, and a prospective part with a questionnaire-based
registration. Setting - 30 general practice clinics in the catchment
area of Vejle County Central Hospital. Subjects - Retrospectively, all
patients from general practice serviced by the laboratory for one yea
r. Prospectively, 1190 patients from whom a blood sample was taken for
CRP-measurement during a 2 month study period. Main outcome measures
- The frequency of using CRP and the reason requesting it; A) diagnosi
ng a new disease, B) monitoring a well known disease, or C) ''screenin
g''. Furthermore; 1) infections, 2) chronic inflammatory disease, 3) m
alignant disease, or 4) others. Results - CRP-measurements were ordere
d in 3.7% of all consultations in general practice and for 34.1% of al
l patients whose blood sample was analysed at the central laboratory.
The use of CRP was as follows: A-1: 28.6%, A-2: 6.7%, A-3,4: 9.3%, B-l
: 8.2%, B-2: 12.4%, B-3,4: 6.5%, C-l: 5.7%, C-2: 3.2%, C-3: 3.5% and C
-4: 15.2%. Diagnosing a new (infectious) disease was the most frequent
single reason for CRP-measurement. There was major interpractice vari
ation. Conclusions - CRP is frequently used in general practice, mostl
y (65.4%) in the field of infections and chronic inflammatory diseases
. Because of major interpractice variation, the most correct way of us
ing CRP should be evaluated and guidelines should be provided.