The Dot Counting Test (DCT) offers a technique for malingering detecti
on that is less transparent than the forced-choice resting that has re
ceived so much recent attention. The present study defined six depende
nt variables derived from DCT responses, and examined these variables
in rile context of differentiating simulators from non-simulators. Fou
r groups of subjects were studied: normal controls, neuropsychological
evaluation patients, naive (uncoached) malingering simulators, and so
phisticated (coached) malingering simulators. Results demonstrate that
the DCT provides several different scores that significantly differ b
etween simulators and non-simulators. The DCT appears to hold promise
as an additional tool to neuropsychologists in the detection of maling
ering. (C) 1997 National Academy of Neuropsychology.