While a generalized utility maximization approach to migration decisio
nmaking is not innovative, the principal extensions of this paper invo
lve the search for an instrument capable of measuring changes in utili
ty levels consistent with all preferences (i.e., with all forms of uti
lity functions), requiring only data on observed behaviour. Our approa
ch is to construct a Location-Specific Utility Index (LSUI), whose com
ponent variables serve as proxies for the arguments in households' uti
lity functions. The LSUI is calculated for households at two times (be
fore and after the migration decision) and then compared to produce a
utility change index (the Delta Index) for each household. The approac
h is distinctive in that the Delta Index measures only the direction o
f the change in a household's utility level due to its migration. The
ordinal nature of utility rankings thus is not violated through aggreg
ation over households or cross-sectional comparisons of utility levels
. Our database is the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), a longitu
dinal nation-wide sample survey conducted by the University of Michiga
n's Institute for Social Research. It provides information on more tha
n two hundred variables per household per year. The objective is to te
st empirically whether migration is appropriately modelled as utility-
generating behaviour. The testable hypothesis is formulated as follows
: Assuming constant household preferences and expansion of the househo
ld's feasible set over time, the household's utility level is greater
following the migration decision. Stepwise discriminate analysis is us
ed to measure the contributions of the component variables to the move
decision. The conclusion reached through the stepwise discriminate an
alysis is that the LSUI and the Delta Index must be revised to include
only six components: quality of life, proximity to relatives and cult
ural roots, net present value of future earnings, real household consu
mption, job security, and type of housing. The results are compared wi
th the households' migration decisions. The empirical evidence shows t
hat migration may reasonably be modelled as a consumption activity by
households to maximize utility.