Sc. Kaste et al., EFFECT OF HELICAL CT ON THE FREQUENCY OF SEDATION IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS, American journal of roentgenology, 168(4), 1997, pp. 1001-1003
OBJECTIVE. We compared the use of sedation for helical CT examination
of pediatric patients with that for conventional CT studies. MATERIALS
AND METHODS. We retrospectively compared two 4-month periods of CT ex
aminations that differed only in that conventional CT was routinely us
ed in one period and helical CT was exclusively used in the other peri
od, For these two periods, we compared the type and number of CT exami
nations, the sedation used (if any), and the age of patients who requi
red sedation. RESULTS. We performed 1055 conventional CT examinations
in 762 pediatric cancer patients, Of the 264 children who were 8 years
old or younger, 107 had been sedated, In com parison, 1195 helical CT
examinations were performed on 838 patients; of the 246 children 8 ye
ars old or younger, 51 received sedation, For both study groups, the m
ean and median age of the patients was 4 years old. The mean age of pa
tients requiring sedation was 21 (conventional CT) or 20 months (helic
al CT); the median age of patients who required sedation was 2 years o
ld for both study groups, Patients who were 8 years old or younger and
who underwent helical CT required sedation 49% less frequently than s
uch patients who underwent conventional CT, The most dramatic reductio
n occurred among patients who were 3 years old or younger (p less than
or equal to.004). CONCLUSION. Use of helical CT reduced the need for
sedation among our pediatric patients, Fewer sedations may reduce the
risk of complications, decrease disruption of the patient's normal dai
ly activities, and improve patient throughput, The associated savings
in personnel rime and pharmaceutical costs can be redistributed.