Eb. Simonsen et al., MECHANISMS CONTRIBUTING TO DIFFERENT JOINT MOMENTS OBSERVED DURING HUMAN WALKING, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 7(1), 1997, pp. 1-13
The present study investigated factors that contribute to the formatio
n of a previously reported knee joint flexor moment during the stance
phase of walking. Contradictory results have been reported on this fle
xor moment, which some but not all individuals exhibit. Seven healthy
male subjects were high speed filmed while walking across a force plat
form, and EMG recordings were obtained from five leg muscles. To inves
tigate segment interactions, net joint moments about the ankle, knee a
nd hip joint were calculated by inverse dynamics and each term in the
equation used for the moment calculation was evaluated during the time
-course of the step cycle. To test the hypothesis that net joint momen
ts are balanced by an external moment formed by the resulting ground r
eaction vector multiplied by the perpendicular distance to the actual
joint, external moment arms were calculated by the floor reaction forc
e vector approach (ERFV). Contrasting two subjects with different net
joint moments about the knee and ankle joint revealed that the knee jo
int flexor moment could not be explained by an opposite external momen
t. The external moments were calculated by a simplified method (FRFV)
in which the point of force application is incorrect for joints above
the ankle joint, However, at the ankle joint the net joint moment was
always opposed by an external moment of opposite polarity. A detailed
examination of the equation used for the net joint moment calculation
showed that a knee joint flexor moment can be caused directly by a lar
ge plantar flexor moment about the ankle joint. For example, the soleu
s muscle can pull the tibia and generate an extensor moment about the
knee joint, which in turn has to be opposed by a knee flexor moment fr
om the hamstring muscles. Otherwise the desired joint angles cannot be
obtained during human walking. It is therefore suggested that the kin
ematics regarding how the foot is placed on the ground may influence t
he net ankle joint moment, while the moment patterns about the knee an
d hip joint are determined by segment interaction and the requirements
for controlling the direction of the resulting ground reaction vector
. In vertical jumping it is advantageous to generate extensor moments
about the knee and hip joint simultaneously, while in horizontal locom
otion this would result in inefficient vertical movements.