In a recent survey computers were found to break down nine times per y
ear in the average company and computer downtime cost U.S. business $4
billion in 1991. The existing literature that combines pricing and qu
euing analysis of a shared service facility does not explicitly consid
er the failures of computer systems. The objective of this paper is to
examine the impact of computer breakdowns on various aspects of the p
ricing and capacity decisions. Tt also examines the issue whether to a
cquire backup capacity when the computer system is in repair. The resu
lts of this paper show that computer breakdowns have significant impac
t on various aspects of concern. In general, computer breakdowns incre
ase the expected time of jobs in the system, thus discouraging the sub
mission of low-value jobs. Less computer capacity is needed to service
the jobs with higher values compared to the case where a computer wor
ks all the time. The utilization ratio is lower in view of computer br
eakdowns. The firm, faced with computer breakdowns, has to increase th
e price of computer service and the increase in price is significant.
Secondly, the findings suggest that it is imperative to acquire backup
capacity when computing is critical to the firm in terms of high dela
y cost of jobs. The research results support the ''hot backup'' strate
gy, a common industry practice to operate in parallel two computers wi
th the same capacity. Finally, the firm should charge users the total
marginal capacity costs of the firm's computer as well as the backup.