Ar. Frisancho et al., DEVELOPMENTAL, GENETIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS OF LUNG-VOLUMES AT HIGH-ALTITUDE, American journal of human biology, 9(2), 1997, pp. 191-203
Vital capacity and residual lung volume (in terms of 1/min or ml/m(2)
of body surface area) of 357 subjects (205 males, 152 females) was eva
luated in La Pat, Bolivia, situated at 3,750 m. The sample included: (
1) 37 high altitude rural natives (all male), (2) 125 high altitude ur
ban natives (69 male, 58 female), (3) 85 Bolivians of foreign ancestry
acclimatized to high altitude since birth (40 male, 45 female), (4) 6
3 Bolivians of foreign ancestry acclimatized to high altitude during g
rowth (30 male, 33 female), and (5) 47 non-Bolivians of either Europea
n or North American ancestry acclimatized to high altitude during adul
thood (24 male, 23 female). Results indicate that (1) all samples stud
ied, irrespective of origin or acclimatization status, have larger lun
g volumes than those predicted from sea level norms; (2) the high alti
tude rural natives have significantly greater lung volumes (vital capa
city and residual lung volume) than the high altitude urban natives an
d all the non-native high altitude samples; (3) males acclimatized to
high altitude since birth or during growth attain similar lung volumes
as high altitude urban natives and higher residual lung volumes than
subjects acclimatized to high altitude during adulthood but lower than
the high altitude rural natives; (4) females acclimatized to high alt
itude since birth or during growth attain similar lung volumes as subj
ects acclimatized to high altitude during adulthood; (5) age at arriva
l to high altitude is inversely related to residual lung volume but no
t vital capacity; (6) among subjects acclimatized to high altitude dur
ing growth, approximately 20-25% of the variability in residual lung v
olume can be explained by developmental factors; (7) among high altitu
de rural and urban natives, it appears that approximately 20-25% of th
e variability in residual lung volume at high altitude can be explaine
d by genetic traits associated with skin reflectance and genetic trait
s shared by siblings; and (8) vital capacity, but not the residual lun
g volume, is inversely related to occupational activity level. Togethe
r these data suggest that the attainment of vital capacity at high alt
itude is influenced more by environmental factors, such as occupationa
l activity level, and body composition than developmental acclimatizat
ion. On the other hand, the attainment of an enlarged residual volume
is related to bath developmental acclimatization and genetic factors.
(C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.