This article reviews the 61 alcohol treatment outcome studies publishe
d from 1989-1993 with respect to methodology. Although better assessme
nt of subjects' pretreatment characteristics was noted, a minority of
studies met even the basic requirements of experimental studies. Furth
er, some reversals of methodological progress were observed in several
areas, particularly in collecting outcome data from multiple sources.
It is suggested that funding agencies and journal editors require tha
t submissions meet minimum standards for adequate outcome evaluation.