A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study was unde
rtaken to investigate the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac (123 pati
ents, 100 mg twice daily) in comparison to piroxicam (117 patients, 20
mg once daily and placebo once daily) in patients with osteoarthritis
of the knee. The treatment period of two months was preceded by a was
hout period of one week duration. On completion of the study, patients
in both aceclofenac and piroxicam-treated groups exhibited significan
t improvement in pain intensity and functional capacity of the affecte
d knee, as represented by the Osteoarthritis Severity Index (OSI) (p<0
.0001 and p<0.001 respectively). This was further substantiated follow
ing the patient's assessment of pain intensity using the Visual Analog
ue Scale (VAS), in which significant improvements were demonstrated at
all time points for each treatment group (p<0.001). Although both tre
atment groups showed a significant improvement in all investigator's c
linical assessments (functional exploration of the knee, knee flexion
and extension (EXT)), there were no significant differences between th
e groups. There was, however, a more rapid improvement in knee flexion
in the aceclofenac group after 15 days of treatment. Both aceclofenac
and piroxicam were well tolerated by patients, the most commonly repo
rted adverse events being gastrointestinal, although their incidence w
as low. Only 24 patients on aceclofenac, as opposed to 33 on piroxicam
complained of dyspepsia, epigastralgia and pyrosis. While 7 patients
in each group were withdrawn because of adverse events, only one patie
nt with piroxicam was withdrawn because of severe upper gastrointestin
al bleeding. Twice as many reports of fecal blood loss were made in th
e piroxicam group in comparison to the aceclofenac group. In summary,
this study confirms the therapeutic efficacy of aceclofenac and sugges
ts that it is a well-tolerated alternative NSAID to piroxicam in the t
reatment of osteoarthritis.