A MULTICENTER, PARALLEL COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY OF ONCE-DAILY LISINOPRIL VS ENALAPRIL WITH 24-H AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING IN ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
A. Coca et al., A MULTICENTER, PARALLEL COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY OF ONCE-DAILY LISINOPRIL VS ENALAPRIL WITH 24-H AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING IN ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION, Journal of human hypertension, 10(12), 1996, pp. 837-841
The aim of the study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of o
nce-daily lisinopril vs enalapril both during normal daily activity an
d sleep, in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, After a 4-week wa
sh-out period, 34 patients (17 M, 17 F) aged 22 to 67 years were rando
mized in a multicenter, open, parallel fashion: 17 received lisinopril
(10-20 mg) and 17 enalapril (10-20 mg) for a 12-week period. Twenty-f
our hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed usi
ng an oscillometric non-invasive automated device at both the end of t
he 4-week drug-free baseline period and during the last week of treatm
ent, With no differences in initial blood pressure (BP) between groups
, both drugs significantly reduced office and ABPM values, Lisinopril
tended to reduce BP in a greater extension than enalapril, but only th
e reduction of office systolic BP (SEP) (P = 0.0062), 24-h SBP load (P
= 0.0182) and night time SBP load (P = 0.0316) reached statistical si
gnificance. We conclude that, in spite of a more prominent reduction o
f SBP by lisinopril, both drugs have a similar efficacy in reducing BP
, assessed by both office and ABPM measurements.