DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF TOASTED ALMONDS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERTAND SEMI-TRAINED ASSESSORS

Citation
L. Guerrero et al., DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF TOASTED ALMONDS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERTAND SEMI-TRAINED ASSESSORS, Journal of sensory studies, 12(1), 1997, pp. 39-54
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science & Tenology
Journal title
ISSN journal
08878250
Volume
12
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
39 - 54
Database
ISI
SICI code
0887-8250(1997)12:1<39:DAOTA->2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Classical techniques of descriptive sensory analysis are useful in foo d characterization. However, these methods need trained assessors and an agreed vocabulary. Free Choice Profiling may be regarded as a good alternative as it allows descriptive profiles to be carried out with u ntrained assessors, although certain problems may arise in the generat ion of descriptors and their interpretation. The descriptive profiles, regarding different lots of toasted almonds, generated by a panel of semi-trained assessors and by a panel of expert assessors were compare d. The resulting descriptors were basically the same for both panels. The semi-trained assessors generated less specific and, sometimes, amb iguous and redundant descriptors. The expert assessors showed a higher efficiency in the generation of descriptors, especially regarding tex ture. Both profiles were graphically similar, though a deeper analysis showed that only the expert assessors were able to discriminate very similar products. Using a panel of semi-trained assessors solves the m ain problems which arise when consumers are used in free choice profil ing. However, both panels are not capable of discriminating very simil ar products.