ON THE INTEGRATION OF PERSONALITY-ASSESSMENT METHODS - THE RORSCHACH AND MMPI

Authors
Citation
Gj. Meyer, ON THE INTEGRATION OF PERSONALITY-ASSESSMENT METHODS - THE RORSCHACH AND MMPI, Journal of personality assessment, 68(2), 1997, pp. 297-330
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Social","Psycology, Clinical
ISSN journal
00223891
Volume
68
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
297 - 330
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3891(1997)68:2<297:OTIOPM>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Despite being the most studied and used personality assessment tools, data from the Rorschach and MMPI generally disagree (Archer & Krishnam urthy, 1993a, 1993b). Independence is proposed to result from at least 3 factors: (a) the methods tap unique levels of personality, (b) pers onality has a complex organization, and (c) response styles generate c onsiderable method variance that must be considered in nomothetic rese arch. These ideas led to 5 hypotheses, each of which received support. Rorschach and MMPI response styles are uncorrelated, although respons e styles are quite consistent within a method family. MMPI-2 and Rorsc hach constructs of dysphoria, psychosis, or wariness are uncorrelated when response styles are ignored. However, robust convergent validity is evident when patients have similar response styles on each method ( e.g., for dysphoria, M r =.59) and dysphoria is expressed in opposing ways on each method when response styles are discordant (i.e., M r = - .54). Data from the latter analyses were correlated with genuine clini cal phenomena and implications were discussed for clinical practice an d research.