ROTTERS SOCIAL-LEARNING THEORY AND FEAR OF CRIME - DIFFERENCES BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

Authors
Citation
S. Houts et C. Kassab, ROTTERS SOCIAL-LEARNING THEORY AND FEAR OF CRIME - DIFFERENCES BY RACE AND ETHNICITY, Social science quarterly, 78(1), 1997, pp. 122-136
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Social, Sciences, Interdisciplinary
Journal title
ISSN journal
00384941
Volume
78
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
122 - 136
Database
ISI
SICI code
0038-4941(1997)78:1<122:RSTAFO>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Objective. We used Rotter's (1966) social learning theory to test for differences, by race and ethnicity, in fear of crime. We expected the effects of three constructs composing social learning theory-locus of control, reinforcement value, and social context-to act multiplicative ly on fear of crime. Methods. The analysis was based on results from a telephone survey of a randomly selected sample of 395 white and 122 n onwhite residents, aged eighteen years or older, of a Midwestern city. Results. The main and interactive effects of locus of control, reinfo rcement value, and social context explained a significant proportion o f the variance in the fear-of-crime measure, over and above that contr ibuted by demographic and contextual control variables. The model was more appropriate for explaining fear of crime in white than in nonwhit e respondents, however. Major differences by race and ethnicity in the main and interactive effects of the social learning theory variables were apparent. Conclusions. The model tested here appears to have some value in conceptualizing various contingencies thought to influence f ear of crime. The analysis indicates, however, that further study is n eeded of factors affecting fear of crime, especially in the nonwhite p opulation.