WHAT IS THE OPTIMUM PHASED-ARRAY COIL DESIGN FOR CARDIAC AND TORSO MAGNETIC-RESONANCE

Citation
Pa. Bottomley et al., WHAT IS THE OPTIMUM PHASED-ARRAY COIL DESIGN FOR CARDIAC AND TORSO MAGNETIC-RESONANCE, Magnetic resonance in medicine, 37(4), 1997, pp. 591-599
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
07403194
Volume
37
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
591 - 599
Database
ISI
SICI code
0740-3194(1997)37:4<591:WITOPC>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
To determine the optimum configuration of a phased array MR coil syste m for human cardiac applications, the sensitivity of 10 flexible array designs operating under ideal conditions was calculated at 13 points circling the myocardium of a model torso whose geometry was determined from healthy volunteers. The array geometries that were evaluated inc luded continuous strips of 2, 4, 6, and 10 circular coils of diameter equal to half the torso thickness wrapped laterally around the torso, 2 pairs of coils located on the left side of the chest and back, clust ers of 3 coils in 2 orientations, clusters of 4 and 6 coils, and a hyb rid cross of 6 coils. The 4-, 6-, and 10-coil strip arrays out-perform ed the other designs for a given number of coils, yielding average the oretical sensitivity improvements of 45%, 53%, and 55% relative to a s ingle flexible coil positioned at the point closest to the anterior my ocardium, compared with about 30% for 4- and 6-coil clusters and the P -pair geometry (P < 0.02). A flexible 4-coil strip array was construct ed for a clinical 1.5 T scanner with 15-cm diameter circular surface c oils on flexible circuit board. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of thi s coil at the 13 cardiac locations was measured in 15 normal volunteer s and compared with the SNR measured in images acquired with standard commercial MR coils: a body coil, a flexible torso array, a general pu rpose flexible coil, and, in 4 subjects, a dual array coil. In the pro ne orientation, the average myocardial SNR improvement of the 4-coil s trip array was 650% relative to the whole body coil, compared with 310 -340% for the other commercial coils (P < 0.00005). The twofold advant age over the commercial coils persisted in supine studies (P < 0.00005 , n = 5). Thus, flexible circumferential phased arrays of strips of su rface coils of diameter comparable with the depth of the heart general ly out-perform many other standard geometries for a given number of co ils, and can yield dramatically improved SNR over coils available for general use in the torso.