A. Chase et al., FACTORS INFLUENCING THE FALSE-POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE RATES OF BCR-ABL FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION, Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 18(4), 1997, pp. 246-253
BCR-ABL fluorescence in situ hybridization has a useful role to play i
n experimental and clinical investigations of chronic myeloid leukaemi
a. However, the interpretation of results is complicated by variabilit
y in the false positive rate (FPR) and false negative rate (FNR). We t
herefore examined the effects on FNR and FPR of three factors, namely,
the criteria used for defining a fusion signal, nucleus size, and the
genomic position of the ABL breakpoint. We established two different
criteria for BCR-ABL positivity: by criterion A cells were scored as p
ositive when BCR and ABL signals were overlapping or touching and by c
riterion B cells were positive if they satisfied criterion A or if the
signals were separated by up to one signal diameter. We measured nucl
eus size and Philadelphia (Ph) positivity in 573 cells from normal per
sons and 787 cells from the Ph+ SD-I cell line and related results to
FNRs and FPRs. We also assessed the FNR in Ph+ CFU-GM colonies from fi
ve patients with different ABL breakpoints. We showed that each of the
se factors influenced the FNR and FPR. The less strict criterion (B) f
or Ph positivity increased the FPR but reduced the FNR, the FPR increa
sed as the nucleus size decreased, and the FNR was greatest in CML cel
ls with a 5' ABL breakpoint. We conclude that these factors should be
considered when evaluating the results of FISH studies to detect the B
CR-ABL fusion gene and that analogous factors may influence results of
FISH studies directed at other fusion genes. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc
.