PREPROCESSING OF HPLC TRACE IMPURITY PATTERNS BY WAVELET PACKETS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL FINGERPRINTING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS

Citation
Er. Collantes et al., PREPROCESSING OF HPLC TRACE IMPURITY PATTERNS BY WAVELET PACKETS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL FINGERPRINTING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS, Analytical chemistry, 69(7), 1997, pp. 1392-1397
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Analytical
Journal title
ISSN journal
00032700
Volume
69
Issue
7
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1392 - 1397
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2700(1997)69:7<1392:POHTIP>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The immediate objective of this research program is to evaluate severa l computer-based classifiers as potential tools for pharmaceutical fin gerprinting based on analysis of HPLC trace organic impurity patterns, In the present study, wavelet packets (WPs) are investigated for use as a preprocessor of the chromatographic data taken from commercial sa mples of L-tryptophan (LT) to extract input data appropriate for class ifying the samples according to manufacturer using artificial neural n etworks (ANNs) and the standard classifiers KNN and SIMCA. Using the H aar function, WP decompositions for levels L = 0-10 were generated for the trace impurity patterns of 253 chromatograms corresponding to LT samples that had been produced by six commercial manufacturers. Input sets of N = 20, 30, 40, and 50 inputs were constructed, each one consi sting of the first N/2 WP coefficients and corresponding positions fro m the overall best level (L = 2). The number of hidden nodes in the AN Ns was also varied to optimize performance, Optimal ANN performance ba sed on percent correct classifications of test set data was achieved b y ANN-30-30-6 (97%) and ANN-20-10-6 (94%), where the integers refer to the numbers of input, hidden, and output nodes, respectively, This pe rformance equals or exceeds that obtained previously (Welsh, W. J.; et al, Anal. Chem, 1996, 68, 3473) using 46 inputs from a so-called Wind ow preprocessor (93%). KNN performance with 20 inputs (97%) or 30 inpu ts (90%) from the WP preprocessor also exceeded that obtained from the Window preprocessor (85%), while SIMCA performance with 20 inputs (86 %) or 30 inputs (82%) from the WP preprocessor was slightly inferior t o that obtained from the Window preprocessor (87%), These results indi cate that, at least for the ANN and KNN classifiers considered here, t he WP preprocessor can yield superior performance and with fewer input s compared to the Window preprocessor.