H. Oconnor et al., MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCIL RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ENDOMETRIAL RESECTION VERSUS HYSTERECTOMY IN MANAGEMENT OF MENORRHAGIA, Lancet, 349(9056), 1997, pp. 897-901
Background The most frequent indication for hysterectomy is menorrhagi
a, even though the uterus is normal in a large number of patients. Tra
nscervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) is a less drastic alter
native, but success rates have varied and menorrhagia can recur. We ha
ve tested the hypothesis that the difference in the proportion of wome
n dissatisfied and requiring further surgery within 3 years of TCRE or
hysterectomy would be no more than 15%. Methods 202 women with sympto
matic menorrhagia were recruited to a multicentre, randomised, control
led trial to compare the two interventions. TCRE and hysterectomy were
randomly assigned in a ratio of two to one. The primary endpoints wer
e women's satisfaction and need for further surgery. The patients' psy
chological and Social states were monitored before surgery, then annua
lly with a questionnaire. Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings
Data were available for 172 women (56 hysterectomy, 116 TCRE); 26 wit
hdrew before surgery and four were lost to follow-up. Satisfaction sco
res were higher for hysterectomy than for TCRE throughout follow-up (m
edian 2 years), but the differences were not significant (at 3 years 2
7 [96%] of 28 in hysterectomy group vs 46 [85%] of 54 in TCRE group we
re satisfied; p=0.16). 25 (22%) women in the TCRE group and five (9%)
in the hysterectomy group required further surgery (relative risk 0.46
[95% CI 0.2-1.1], p=0.053). TCRE had the benefits of shorter operatin
g time, fewer complications, and faster rates of recovery. Interpretat
ion TCRE is an acceptable alternative to hysterectomy in the treatment
of menorrhagia for many women with no other serious disorders.