Pe. Whitley, PILOT PERFORMANCE OF THE ANTI-G STRAINING MANEUVER - RESPIRATORY DEMANDS AND BREATHING SYSTEM EFFECTS, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 68(4), 1997, pp. 312-316
Introduction: The anti-G straining maneuver (AGSM) is still an importa
nt part of pilot protection for G-induced loss of consciousness. The s
pecific requirements for and the effects of breathing systems on the p
erformance of the AGSM are essential elements to designing compatible
breathing systems. Methods: Subject pools of 27 and 34 naval aviators
were recruited and used to measure the inhalatory and exhalatory flow
requirements for the AGSM and the breathing system effects of mask cav
ity pressure during AGSM performance on the Naval Air Warfare Center D
ynamic Flight Simulator at acceleration levels up to 8 Gz. Results: Th
e mean peak inhalatory flow was 125.5 L . min(-1) (n = 135, SD = 42.1)
with a maximum value of 274 L . min(-1). The mean peak exhalatory flo
w was 154.4 L . min(-1) (n = 135, SD = 49.6) with a maximum value of 3
08 L . min(-1). For the effects of the breathing system on AGSM perfor
mance, inhalatory mask cavity pressures were not above 30 mmHg with th
e majority less than 10 mmHg. Exhalatory mask cavity pressures did not
exceed 60 mmHg but predominated in the 20-30 mmHg range. In compariso
n to accepted guidelines, 67-77% of inhalatory mask cavity pressures w
ere below and 91% of the exhalatory mask cavity pressures were above t
he Air Standardization and Coordination Committee (ASCC) limit of +/-
14 mmHg. Conclusions: The difference in the peak inhalatory and exhala
tory flows measured during this study and clinically can be attributed
to different test conditions and performer techniques. The reduction
in inhalatory flow with increasing G is consistent with the increase i
n breathing difficulty due to the G load and the inflation of the anti
-G suit. However, exhalatory mechanics appear unaffected by the G load
and the inflation of the anti-G suit. Since 23-33% of the inhalatory
mask cavity pressures were above this ASCC limit, improvements in regu
lator performance are still needed. For exhalatory effects of the brea
thing system, the main contributor is the mask valve. While no pilot s
uffered unconsciousness or expressed complaints with the breathing sys
tems used, these exposures were of short duration. The additional work
of breathing during a combat engagement may further compromise the pi
lot's ability to retain consciousness with the AGSM.