Cm. Callahan et al., PATIENT OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TRICOMPARTMENTAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT - A METAANALYSIS, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 271(17), 1994, pp. 1349-1357
Objective.-To provide estimates of patient outcomes following tricompa
rtmental knee replacement and to examine variation in outcomes due to
patient and prosthesis characteristics. Data Sources.-English-language
articles identified through a computerized literature search and bibl
iography review. Study Selection.-Studies were included it they enroll
ed 10 or more patients at the time of initial knee replacement and mea
sured patient outcomes using a global knee-rating scale. Data Extracti
on.-Each study was subjected to a blinded qualitative assessment and u
nblinded abstraction of patient characteristics, surgical techniques,
and outcomes. Data Synthesis.-A total of 130 studies reporting patient
outcomes on 154 cohorts satisfied inclusion criteria. The total numbe
r of enrolled patients was 9879 with a mean enrollment of 64.1 patient
s. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years. The mean patient age was 65.0 yea
rs, 71.7% of patients were women, 62.6% had osteoarthritis, and 26.6%
underwent bilateral knee replacement. Global rating scale scores impro
ved by 100% for the typical enrolled patient, and 89.3% of patients re
ported good or excellent outcomes. Anatomic classification of the pros
thesis, percentage of enrolled patients with osteoarthritis, publicati
on year, and number of enrolled patients explained 27% of the variatio
n in reported mean postoperative global rating scale scores. The weigh
ted mean complication rate was 18.1%, and the mean mortality rate per
year of follow-up was 1.5%. The overall rate of revision during 4.1 ye
ars was 3.8%. Conclusions.-Tricompartmental knee replacement was a saf
e and effective procedure for the patients reported in these studies.
The knee pathology and the type of prosthesis were significant predict
ors of outcomes. Limitations in the reporting style of these articles
severely constrain the ability to explore variation in outcomes due to
study, patient, or prosthesis characteristics and restrict their gene
ralizability.