ULTRASOUND EVALUATION OF BLUNT ABDOMINAL-TRAUMA - PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION, INITIAL EXPERIENCE, AND LEARNING-CURVE

Objective: Although sonographic screening for blunt abdominal trauma i s gaining acceptance, standards for implementation, training, credenti aling, and quality control remain to be established. Design: This pros pective study examines a Level I trauma service experience with the de novo establishment of a trauma ultrasound (US) program credentialed t hrough the Department of Surgery under the auspices of Continuous Qual ity Improvement. Materials and Methods: All trauma surgeons attended a combined didactic and ''hands on'' 8-hour trauma US course, Abdominal sonography was subsequently performed on patients with potential blun t abdominal trauma followed by a standard diagnostic evaluation, which included computed tomographic scan, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, or observation. Measurements and Main Results: Three hundred patients wer e studied over a 4-month period, They averaged 35 years of age with an average injury severity score of 12, The time required to perform the US examination averaged less than 3 minutes, Standard diagnostic eval uation included computed tomographic scan (21%), diagnostic peritoneal lavage (45%), and observation (34%), US examinations resulted in 277 true negatives, 17 true positives, two false positives, and four false negatives for a sensitivity of 81.0%, a specificity of 99.3%, and an accuracy of 98.0%, Annualized cost savings with the use of US evaluati on versus standard diagnostic evaluation would amount to over $100,000 .00. Conclusions: This experience with the de novo implementation of a trauma US program suggests that the training and credentialing requir ements in this study are sufficient to provide surgeon ultrasonographe rs with acceptable competence in US diagnosis of blunt abdominal traum a.