Me. Thase et al., WHICH DEPRESSED-PATIENTS WILL RESPOND TO INTERPERSONAL PSYCHOTHERAPY - THE ROLE OF ABNORMAL EEG SLEEP PROFILES, The American journal of psychiatry, 154(4), 1997, pp. 502-509
Objective: The authors tested the hypothesis that patients whose episo
des of major depression evidenced more neurobiological disturbance wou
ld be less responsive to psychotherapy. Method: The study subjects wer
e outpatients who were given a diagnosis of recurrent major depressive
disorder (unipolar or bipolar II), according to the Research Diagnost
ic Criteria, following an interview with the Schedule for Affective Di
sorders and Schizophrenia. They were classified into a group with norm
al sleep profiles (N=50) and a group with abnormal sleep profiles (N=4
1) on the basis of a validated index score derived from three EEG slee
p variables monitored for 2 nights: sleep efficiency, REM latency, and
REM density. The groups' responses to short-term interpersonal psycho
therapy were compared by means of chi-square tests and life table and
random effects model analyses. Responses to the addition of pharmacoth
erapy for subjects who did not respond to interpersonal psychotherapy
were also compared. Results: The patients with abnormal sleep profiles
had significantly poorer clinical outcomes with respect to symptom ra
tings, attrition rates, and remission rates than the patients with mor
e normal sleep profiles. Seventy-Jive percent of the patients who did
not respond to interpersonal psychotherapy had remissions during subse
quent pharmacotherapy. Conclusions: These findings help to define furt
her a neurobiological ''boundary'' that may limit response to psychoth
erapy in depression. An abnormal sleep profile may reflect a more mark
ed disturbance of CNS arousal that warrants pharmacotherapy.