Under normal viewing conditions we are little conscious of blur in mov
ing objects, despite the persistence of vision. Moving objects look mo
re blurred in brief than in long exposures, suggesting an active mecha
nism for suppressing motion blur. To see whether blur suppression woul
d improve visual discrimination of objects, we measured blur discrimin
ation thresholds for moving Gaussian-blurred edges and bars. The obser
ver's task was to decide which of two moving stimuli, presented succes
sively, was the more blurred. It is known that for stationary objects
the just-noticeable difference in blur increases with baseline blur; t
herefore, if motion increases blur, it would be expected to increase t
he just-noticeable difference in blur. An active deblurring mechanism,
on the other hand, would be expected to counteract the detrimental ef
fects of motion blur on discrimination performance. We found, however,
that motion increased thresholds for blur discrimination, both for br
ief (40 ms) and for longer (150 ms) exposures. We conclude that motion
deblurring is a subjective effect, which does not enhance visual disc
rimination performance. Moving objects appear sharp, not because of so
me special mechanism that removes blur, but because the visual system
is unable to perform the discrimination necessary to decide whether th
e moving object is really sharp or not.