D. Raneszostak et Jf. Robertson, ISSUES IN MEASURING CRITICAL THINKING - MEETING THE CHALLENGE, The Journal of nursing education, 35(1), 1996, pp. 5-11
Recent changes in NLN criteria for accreditation highlight the need to
measure growth in critical thinking (CT). Choosing the most appropria
te methods to measure CT within a specific nursing program poses signi
ficant challenges for nurse educators. This article explores major iss
ues in measuring critical thinking, including: a) developing a clear d
efinition of this concept, b) matching the definition to program goals
, c) using value-added assessment and d) deciding between norm versus
criterion-referenced methods. Detailed discussion focuses on decisions
that must be made regarding instrument selection. Issues such as reli
ability and validity of measures, sensitivity of test scores to expect
ed growth, the importance of matching methods to program CT definition
, and the need for adequate resources are described. Strengths and wea
knesses of commercial instruments that measure critical thinking, as w
ell as the alternative techniques of portfolios and performance assess
ment, are reviewed.