Ss. Kroll et al., A COMPARISON OF RESOURCE COSTS FOR HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION WITH FREE AND PECTORALIS MAJOR FLAPS, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 99(5), 1997, pp. 1282-1286
A series of 178 immediate reconstructions with regional or distant tis
sue for repair of oropharyngeal defects caused by treatment of head an
d neck cancer was reviewed to determine whether reconstruction with fr
ee flaps was more or less expensive than reconstruction with regional
myocutaneous flaps. In this series, three types of flaps were used: th
e radial forearm free flap (n = 89), the rectus abdominis free flap (n
= 56), and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (n = 33). Resource
costs were determined by adding all costs to the institution of provid
ing each service studied using salaried employees (including physician
s). The two free-flap groups were combined to compare free flaps with
the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, a regional myocutaneous flap.
Failure rates in the two groups were similar (3.0 percent for pectoral
is major myocutaneous flap, 3.4 percent for free flaps). The mean cost
s of surgery were slightly higher for the free flaps, but the subseque
nt hospital stay costs were lower. Therefore, the total mean resource
cost for the free-flap group ($28,460) was lower than the cost for the
myocutaneous-flap group ($40,992). The pectoralis major myocutaneous
flap may have been selected for more patients with advanced disease an
d systemic medical problems, contributing to longer hospitalization an
d added cost. Nevertheless, this study suggests that free flaps are no
t more expensive than other methods and may provide cost savings for s
elected patients.