Kj. Tack et al., STUDY OF USE OF CEFDINIR VERSUS CEPHALEXIN FOR TREATMENT OF SKIN INFECTIONS IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 41(4), 1997, pp. 739-742
Three hundred ninety-four patients, aged 6 months to 12 years, entered
a multicenter, randomized, controlled, investigator-blind study compa
ring cefdinir, 7 mg/kg of body weight twice a day,,vith cephalexin, 10
mg/kg four times a day, each given for 10 days. The most common infec
tions treated were impetigo and secondary infection of preexisting der
matitis. The most common pathogens isolated were Staphylococcus aureus
and Streptococcus pyogenes. Two hundred thirty-one patients were micr
obiologically evaluable, Microbiologic eradication rates were 164 of 1
65 pathogens (99.4%) in the cefdinir group and 152 of 156 pathogens (9
7.3%) in the cephalexin group (P = 0.14), Clinical cure rates were 116
of 118 patients (98.3%) in the cefdinir group and 106 of 113 patients
(93.8%) in the cephalexin group (P = 0.056), Sixteen percent of cefdi
nir patients and 11% of cephalexin patients experienced adverse events
(P = 0.11), the most common being diarrhea, which affected 8% of the
cefdinir group and 4% of the cephalexin group, Cefdinir appears to be
an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of uncomplicat
ed skin and skin structure infections in pediatric patients.