COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE - IMMUNOFLUORESCENT COLONY STAINING, AND A TRANSGENIC MARKER (BIOLUMINESCENCE) FOR MONITORINGTHE ENVIRONMENTAL FATE OF A RHIZOBACTERIUM

Citation
Wf. Mahaffee et al., COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE - IMMUNOFLUORESCENT COLONY STAINING, AND A TRANSGENIC MARKER (BIOLUMINESCENCE) FOR MONITORINGTHE ENVIRONMENTAL FATE OF A RHIZOBACTERIUM, Applied and environmental microbiology, 63(4), 1997, pp. 1617-1622
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology,"Biothechnology & Applied Migrobiology
ISSN journal
00992240
Volume
63
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1617 - 1622
Database
ISI
SICI code
0099-2240(1997)63:4<1617:COA-IC>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Field releases of the mild-type plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens 89B-27, its bioluminescent derivative GEM-8 (8 9B-27::Tn4431), and a spontaneous rifampin-resistant variant (R34) wer e established on cucumber in 1994 and 1995 to examine the efficiency o f these marker systems for estimating the wild-type population, Seed a nd root samples were taken 0, 7, 14, 21 or 28, 35 or 42, and 70 days a fter planting in each year and processed for enumeration by spiral pla ting or immunofluorescent colony staining (IFC), In both Sears, the po pulations of 89B-27. R34, and GEM-8, as measured by IFC, were not sign ificantly different (P > 0.05) from each other at each sampling time, However, the populations of R34 and GEM-8, as measured by spiral plati ng and differentiation based on their respective phenotypes, were sign ificantly lower (P < 0.05) than the wild-type populations and their IF C-determined populations, These data indicate that traditional marker systems may underestimate populations and hence the survival and colon ization of genetically marked bacteria.