Jp. Guerrieri et al., EVALUATING THE ENDOMETRIUM IN WOMEN ON TAMOXIFEN, A PILOT-STUDY TO COMPARE A GOLD STANDARD WITH AN OLD STANDARD, Menopause, 4(1), 1997, pp. 6-9
Our purpose was to compare the response of a progesterone challenge te
st to endometrial histology in asymptomatic postmenopausal breast canc
er patients on tamoxifen. Forty-eight asymptomatic (amenorrheic) postm
enopausal breast cancer patients on 20 mg of tamoxifen daily for at le
ast 6 months participated in the study. Patients underwent endometrial
biopsy followed by ingestion of 10 mg daily of medroxyprogesterone ac
etate (Provera) for 10 days. Biopsy samples were considered positive f
or estrogen effect if they revealed proliferative endometrium, endomet
rial hyperplasia, or endometrial cancer. The progesterone challenge te
st was considered positive if the patient experienced vaginal bleeding
within 10 days following completion of the Provera regimen. Three of
the 48 women had positive progesterone challenge tests after endometri
al biopsy. In each case, the corresponding histology was positive for
estrogen effect. Positive estrogen effect was highly correlated with a
positive progesterone challenge test [sensitivity 100%, 95% confidenc
e interval (CI) = 0.44-1.00], while a negative estrogen effect was hig
hly correlated with a negative progesterone challenge test (specificit
y 100%, 95% CI = 0.92-1.00). The progesterone challenge test reliably
predicted when the endometrium was unstimulated by tamoxifen and detec
ted those women who histologically displayed endometrial stimulation.
The progesterone challenge test could act as a readily available and c
ost-effective tool for endometrial screening in asymptomatic postmenop
ausal women on tamoxifen.